Best Fluar alternatives
(Clay and Freckle)

What are data enrichment tools?

Data enrichment tools take a basic list of leads, companies, or contacts and fill in the gaps: job titles, emails, company size, tech stack, funding data, and more. Instead of manually researching each record, you define what data you need and the tool pulls it from public sources, APIs, and AI models. The three main players in this space are Clay, Freckle, and Fluar.

Head to head

Feature comparison

Feature	Fluar	Clay	Freckle
AI enrichment cost	Fractional, per token e.g. 0.241 credits	Per output	Per output
Fluar uses fractional, token-based pricing. The same enrichment that costs 2 credits in Clay might cost 0.241 credits in Fluar, because you only pay for the tokens used.
Full API	Yes	No	No
CRM integrations	All plans	$800/mo plan	All plans
Webhooks	All plans	$349/mo plan	All plans
API columns	All plans	$149/mo plan	All plans
Own API keys	$69/mo plan	$149/mo plan	$99/mo plan
Pay per use	Yes	No	No
Yearly discount	17%	10%	15%
MCP / Claude Code	Full integration	Simplified	No
Overall cost	Efficient	Expensive if misconfigured	Medium
Best for	Founders, GTM Engineers, developers, n8n builders	Claygencies, scale-ups, enterprises	CRM enrichment

Deep dives

Explore by competitor

Clay Alternatives

GTM platform with flexible workflows and a large integration ecosystem. Best at high volume.

Freckle Alternatives

Data enrichment tool with built-in scraping. Good for mid-tier volumes and simple extraction.